Git stash needs merge

Video Git stash needs merge

Sometimes, when we are working with our local changes in a Git repo, we may want to pull the latest updates from the remote repository. To avoid code conflict between remote files and local files. We can use git stash to store the unfinished local work temporarily.

Git-stash gives you a clean repo and revert the repo state to last commit. Then we can use git pull to pull the updates.

Stashed changes are per repository, not per branch.

If you are in a certain branch and do a git stash, you may think that the stashed changes only belong to that branch. However, that is not the case. Since you have not committed the changes, they do not belong to any branch, even if you are currently working on a specific branch (see here).

Show stashed changes

Read more: Command gcc failed with exit status 1

To show stashed changes, use git stash list. It will show a list of stash you have made.

Show the detailed info of a particular stash

Each stash in the stash list can be referenced by its number. To show changes in a particular stash, we can use the following command:

The above command only shows summary changes to files in a stash. To show detailed changes of a stash, add the -p option:

After the git-pull, we may want to continue our unfinished work. We can use git stash pop to restore unfinished work. You can also use git stash apply instead. The difference between git stash pop and git stash apply is that the former will drop the stash if there is no merge conflict, while the later will never drop the stash even if the stashed changes merge successfully with the pulled code.

Read more: Firebasevisionface

Anyway, if everything goes well, our unfinished changes can merge with the remote updates without any conflict. However, if we and other collaborator both have changed the same file at the same place, we will encounter merge errors after git-stash. The error message is like the following:

When we open the conflict file, we will see some markers like the following:

These markers are called conflict markers, which are used to indicate the conflicting changes made to a file.

In the git-stash case, code between <<<<<<< and ======= are the changes made upstream, and code between ======= and >>>>>>> are your stashed changes.

Read more: How to be like andrew tate

To merge the conflict, you have basically two methods:

  • Resolve the conflict manually: decide if you want your change or the upstream change or you want to combine the local and remote change. Then edit the file accordingly and remove those conflict markers.
  • Resolve the conflict with mergetools. See here for an introduction.

Mark conflict as resolved

After resolving the conflict, you can use git add to mark the conflict as resolved. But in the git-stash scenario, you may not want to do this since your changes are not finished yet.

Or you can use git reset to mark that the conflict has been solved. You can continue working on your project until your changes are completed, and then commit your changes.

After the conflict has been resolved, do not forget to use git stash drop to drop the stash because the stash will not be dropped automatically in case of a merge conflict.

  • Preview changes for a git stash.
  • Difference between git stash pop and git stash apply.
  • Git merge left HEAD marks in my files.
  • Resolve Git stash conflict..
  • https://stackoverflow.com/q/55366930/6064933
  • Resolve git stash conflict without commiting.
  • Resolve conflict after stash pop.

Related Posts